The Impact of Clerestory Window Height on the Performance of Fixed Horizontal Lightshelf on Daylighting Classroom in Dhaka, Bangladesh

Md Fahad Islam

doi:10.18034/ajase.v10i1.19

Authors

Md Fahad Islam Architect

Keywords:

Light shelf

clerestory window

daylight simulation

classroom

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of clerestory window height on fixed horizontal light shelf performance regarding daylighting quality in classrooms. As a case study, a south-facing classroom of a university located in Dhaka was selected, and five alternative models of 3300 mm high case spaces were created with light shelves at the height of 2100mm above the floor finish. Varying heights of clerestory windows were used in the models to analyze the influence of clerestory windows on light shelves' performances. The three-dimensional models of the classrooms were first generated in Ecotect to investigate the interior illuminance level and uniformity distribution with static daylight performance metrics. The models were also imported to Radiance, a raytracing software, to create rendered images for crosschecking and validating Ecotect findings. Then, to compare the findings with dynamic daylight metrics, the results were verified and refined with DAYSIM. The result showed that a 750 mm high clerestory window with a fixed horizontal light shelf at the height of 2100mm above floor finish performed better for a classroom face south compared to other studied alternative clerestory window heights.

References

Ahmed, Z. N., 1987. 'The effects of Climate on the design and Location of windows for Buildings in Bangladesh', MPhil thesis. Sheffield City Polytechnic.

Ali, A. A. M. & Ahmed, T. M. F., 2012. Evaluating the impact of shading devices on the indoor thermal. Madison, IBPSA, pp. 603-612.

Baten, P. & Joarder, M. A. R., 2020. Influence of the Height of Light Shelves on Daylighting Classrooms: A Case of Two Windows in Two Different Orientations. Kuala Lumpur, TIIKM, pp. 54-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17501/26731029.2020.1205

Berardi, U. & Anaraki, H. K., 2018. The benefits of light shelves over the daylight illuminance in office buildings in Toronto. Indoor and Built Environment, 27(2), pp. 244-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X16673413

BNBC, 2006. Bangladesh National Building Codes. Dhaka: Housing and Building Research Institute.

Crawley, D., Hand, J., Kummert, M. & Griffith, B., 2005. Contrasting the Capabilities of Building Energy Performance Simulation Programs Joint Report Version 1.0, Montreal: International Building Performance Simulation Association.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. & Alkassim, R., 2016. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), pp. 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Heschong Mahone Group, 1999. Daylighting in School: An Investigation into the Relationship between Daylighting and Human Performance. [Online]

Available at: https://h-m-g.com/downloads/Daylighting/order_daylighting.htm

Joarder, M. A. R., Ahmed, Z. N., Price, A. & Mourshed, M., 2009. A simulation assessment of the height of light shelves to enhance daylighting quality in tropical office buildings under overcast sky conditions in Dhaka, Banlgadesh. Glasgow, IBPSA , p. 920–927.

Khan, M., 2005. Rethinking Learning Spaces: In warm-humid climatic context with special reference to Dhaka, Bangladesh, MA thesis. Architectural Association Graduation School.

Koenigsberger, O., Iingersoll, T., Mayhew, A. & Szokolay, S., 1997. Manual of Tropical Housing and Building, Climatic Design, Chennai: Orient Longman Ltd.

Littlefair, P. J., 1995. Light shelves: Computer assessment of daylighting performance. International Journal of Lighting Research and Technology, 27(2), p. 79–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14771535950270020201

Murshed, M., 2020. Electricity conservation opportunities within private university campuses in Bangladesh. Energy & environment, 31(2), p. 256–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X19857209

Nabil, A. & Mardaljevic, J., 2006. Useful daylight illuminance: A replacement for daylight factors. Energy and buildings, 38(7), pp. 905-913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.013

Osaji, E. & Price, A., 2009. The Role of Parametric Modelling and Environmental Simulation in Stimulating Innovation in Healthcare Building Design and Performance. Brighton, Health and Care Infrastructure Research and Innovation Centre, pp. 135-44.

Place, W. & Howard, T. C. .., 1990. Daylighting Multistory Office Buildings. Raleigh: North Carolina Alternative Energy Corporation.

Reinhart, C., Mardaljevic, j. & Rogers, Z., 2006. Dynamic daylight performance metrics for sustainable building design. Leukos, 3(1), pp. 7-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1582/LEUKOS.2006.03.01.001

Ruck, N. et al., 2001. Daylight in Buildings: a source book on daylighting. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Selkowitz, S., Navvab, M. & Mathews, S., 1983. Design and Performance of Light Shelves. Phoenix, AIA, pp. 267-272.

Sharmin, T., 2011. Study of the Luminous Environment in Architecture Design Studios of Bangladesh. M. Arch thesis, Bangladesh University of Science and Technology.

Surat, Mirrahimi, S., Lukman, N. & Ibrahim, N., 2013. Effect of daylighting on student health and performance. Kuala Lumpur, WESEAS Press, p. 127–132.

Zakhour, S., 2015. The Influence of Selected Design Parameters on the Performance of Light Shelves under Overcast Conditions. Architecture Research, 5(4), pp. 113-120.